Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | QuantumNoodle's commentslogin

Do you have any resources on hardware necessary for running models and tweaks? I see you mention 2x 3090 and I wanted to do more search on what hardware is satisfactory for what models.

I am in no way supportive of monopolies though taking "the need to compete" out of the equation and having steady flow of money that won't be cut off if "someone beats you to market" was pretty revolutionary. Consider Bell Labs, staffed with real "nerds" that never had to prostitute themselves or to pitch an idea on the merits of making money -- they simply did stuff that was fun, in ther nerdy way. Because of this we have wireless communication, transistors, digital cameras sensors, c, and many others.

(There were a lot of negatives due to this AT&T monopoly but we are talking about nerds here and having to socialize your own worth/value. It's a shitty game that real nerds aren't necessary interested in playing)


Man, I never hear good security things about npm

This doesn't really have anything to do with npm.

From the Arch mailing list [0]

>The result is a rather long list of ~408 packages all doing npm install atomic-lockfile something something

[0] https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-general@lists....


They could've pip installed, curl|sh'd or anything else, it's not relevant to the underlying issue.

Perhaps there were other vectors, but npm was the one used here.

And yes, this is an AUR issue, but npm being used to host and dissiminate malware is also [a chronic] one, even if separate.


anything except that it's malware installed via npm

As you can see here, they've already switched it out for a different command, likely due to incident responders over-indexing on npm as an IOC.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48503258


So true. The JavaScript ecosystem is trash.

I want to see more of "I'm rejecting this offer to work for Google bc my moral compass" not from folks who are paid out and ready for the next thing already.

its funny how long some people wait to decide the company they work for has lost their moral compass. "dont be evil" is already 8 years dead at this point.

I mean, I get it. I have a family, financial obligations, etc. Certainly not shaming anyone for fulfilling those obligations working for a successful company. But don't put yourself up on a pedestal and cloak yourself in righteousness behind a veil of strong morals.

While EU is actively trying to erode encryption and privacy of all digital communications.

Looks like he updated his "About me" section

> At the moment, my main focus is [...] fighting against (governmental or corporate) mass surveillance

While he always had "Ethics in Computer Science” as an interest, I wonder what blinds people into accepting offers at Google -- the advertising company. I want to take his words as sincere, but Google has been privacy violating for longer than his tenure with android. Money and prestige is a hell of a drug I suppose. He could very well work for grapheneos but no money or immediate persteige there (sadly).


To me, Google switched the "Evil bit" around the time of the Dragonfly debacle (2018)

If OP is only seeing the problems now, they must have been selectively blind.


I mean, I get it. I have a family, financial obligations, etc. Certainly not shaming anyone for fulfilling those obligations working for a successful company. But don't put yourself up on a pedestal and cloak yourself in righteousness behind a veil of strong morals

I've worked roles where our priorities shift with the wind. Many times it is for good reason, like a strategic customer to get a foothold in a market. Other times it is just because management hyped up some effort. All's this to say, nod saying you will do it then just go about your day doing focusing on the actual priorities. Don't let workload mount up bc deadlines are all made up.

Ironic that the other trending HN post is "EU-banned pesticides found in rice, tea and spices"

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447062


Goodness, what an unreasonably long description for an issue.

It sounds like a number of less comprehensive issues on this topic were closed without adequate explanation, so the author wanted to be sure to comprehensively explain why the issue was valid and what they were looking for.

Sorry did you read the article or just the headline? The theme is mathematics is a human-endevor and automation undermines that, particularly the ones starting out. It risks killing the culture entirely. Some other key points:

- AI-generated papers could overwhelm peer-review systems with low-quality work.

- It may become difficult to assign proper credit for discoveries.

- Researchers who choose not to use AI tools could be disadvantaged.

- There are ethical concerns about mathematical work being used to train AI for military and surveillance purposes.


>mathematics is a human-endevor

Just like numbers and logic, it isn't and never was reserved only for humans.

They need to adapt.


Idk man creativity is something pretty human. insufferable people are very fine if, for example, music & art is outsourced to AI so they can make a some $$. But those things are meant to be enjoyed, not consumed.

This fact is no longer true. The mathematic domains are up for grabs by anything that can conquer it: https://openai.com/index/model-disproves-discrete-geometry-c...


I don't see how this is different than things replaced decades ago:

Music is a human endeavor and musical recordings hurt musicians, bands, orchestras, etc. Especially those starting out.


This feels like a troll comment, but I'll bite.

Mathematics requires substantial creativity at every level. There is problem selection, conjecture formation, proof strategies, definitions, models, and explanations. Yes, it's constrained and guided by logic and rigor but having logic won't give you creativity.

> Music is a human endeavor and musical recordings hurt musicians, bands, orchestras, etc. Especially those starting out.

The medium it is recorded on has no bearing on what composed the music. If people don't get rewarded for composing they won't. Same with mathematics. If people don't get paid for being creative they just won't be creative.

I am not saying I agree with everything in the article. OP of this thread just made a low effort comment that was addressed in lengths during the article.


I should be able to have a different opinion without being a troll.

My point is to say many things have been replaced by technology over the years, but people do them as hobbies.


Mathematics is not inherently a human endeavor and claims such as those are why the GOP voters are fine with cutting research funding so heavily. Even if you think it's true you probably shouldnt write think pieces that say so because it's bad politics.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: