I think it isn't cool considering even that. It certainly feels like the holding company strategy was done to embark on more traditional run-of-the-mill pursuits, while avoiding obvious questions like how on Earth does it make any sense for Google to do this?!
Wouldn't that put Elon Musk in the bad books as per your rather prejudicial yardstick of measuring the worthiness of a person at the helm of a company?
Also, it was Advitiya (the other co-founder) at Housing who crashed his car.
Correlation is not causation. Just because Elon Musk did so does not mean that rate of success among car crashing CEOs is not lower than the rest of them.
You've got to look at a nominal case, the median, not the outlying example to justify your mistakes.
Hi – this is a wonderful start towards solving a problem which seemed to have been relegated to the distant future.
I was wondering, do you folks support the 'aggregator' model - where a startup can simply serve as the facilitator of the payment without actually holding the money?
Wrote a mail to you as well to understand better how I can integrate your solution.
