Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | brookst's commentslogin

I don’t see the contradiction? If the inventory of clicks is declining and the number of businesses bidding on clicks is more or less constant, why wouldn’t that increase price?

Maybe? It seems like their strategy is to accept that safety is imperfect, err on the side of over-triggering, and iterate.

I don’t think it’s a black and white “if fable 5 over triggers on bio safety in 2026, that’s the final pattern we should expect to see from post-Mythos 20 in 2036”


How do you validate “the real owner” if having the keys isn’t enough? That sufficient to steal the car.

You could do a PIN/password, but if it is never used during operation, nobody will know it. Ask anyone who’s had a head unit that needed a PIN after losing power.


Mere possession is also enough for someone to steal your laptop, but that still shouldn't allow them to trivially install a secret persistent backdoor, or break your disk encryption.

Agree that a PIN/Password would have usability problems with a car. Since no car manufacturer intentionally permits you to install software you want, there's no standard mechanism. But if this was standard I think an owner-set PIN would be very reasonable.


That doesn’t mean you don’t bother to secure the local device. I strongly suspect you have login security in your physical devices. Maybe even full disk encryption.

Just because a sufficiently advanced and determined attacker can own any device with physical access doesn’t mean we might as well make it easy for anyone.


The observation was that death row represents the highest level of scrutiny, and still had 10% false positives for guilt.

Is there any argument that less-scrutinized cases would have a lower level of false convictions?


The 10% claim has been refuted.

What % is it?

Read other replies. I don't think we have enough data to give an opinion exact number but less than 1

I like it! Though give the focus you had AIpaca sitting right there… (best read with sans serif font)

I’m co-developing lots of projects with AI. Right now I have a hand-rolled backlog system that lives in each project’s git repo with a standard prompt on how to create, triage, and review backlog items.

This looks great for me. Better than what I have, smaller/cheaper/more AI focused than Jira.


Most corrupt US administration in history, by a long shot.

Wonder how many US-based early-stage startups are using Opus to research incorporating and moving overseas at this very moment.

EU isn’t tenable, UK is iffy. Australia? Thailand? Who wants to be innovation-friendly?


And experiences absolutely benefit from productivity improvements. AI has helped me plan better trips, find places and activities I had no idea about, better prepare for weather in remote destinations.

It’s said that “productivity” is mistakenly connoted as scoped to work.


I don’t know that Terry much cares about the opinions of people who judge claims based on innuendo and cynicism rather than the actual merits of the claim.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: