It felt a lot better, but it was just a feeling. None of the stuff I had Fable do actually worked, but it looked great.

Yeah, guess I will keep buying games years after release when they have been patched and are cheaper.

Bribes and subsidies is my guess

Pretty sure the secret sauce is in the summarised thinking. Maybe better though process… But I have a feeling it’s server side tools and a scratch space to prepare the reply.

Sometimes the summarised thoughts include stuff that makes no sense unless it’s got a workspace on the server. Stuff like “I am now writing x to file y”.

Not championing it, but this is where something like OpenClaw comes into play, right? The harness around the model, the ability to call tools, etc.

No, that would not make any difference in terms of what being described here

Don’t worry about it, Anthropic is banned from releasing new models anyway.

Try out some of the competitors, they are really good these days.

Yeah Claude was down I tried OpenCode and it seems reliable. Any one got any experience with large projects?

I have been pretty happy with OpenCode and the Go plan, but I have only been using it on small ~20k line projects so far.

Yes. Opencode was the best, but went to shit lately. Currently omp is the best. Oh my pi

I can't build workflows on something that can randomly be unavailable for over a week.

At this point the future availability of Anthropic models outside the US is very unclear.

install opencode, then either pay $10 for their plan, or add an openrouter api key.

Might be bribes and subsidies

ArsTechnica has a nice graph showing it

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/leaked-financial-docs-sho...

And I believe this is the actual source

https://www.wheresyoured.at/exclusive-openai-financials/

One of these two should be the main link tbh

Just let go of the entire R&D team and then you have a 50% margin business.

UPDATE: Also bad news, you need to let go of all of sales and marketing and G&A. And THEN it's a 50% margin business.

Can't do that.

If they get rid of R&D, then someone else will make a better model and we will all switch to using that model.

If sales & marketing covers subsidies and bribes then they cant get rid of that either. Get rid of the bribes and they will be shut down. Get rid of the subsidies and we will all switch to someone cheaper.

This also shows that 2025 paid for 2024.

Unless they increased their spending even more, "all they have to do" is cover 2025 with the 2026 revenue?

Do you think they can cover 2026 with 2027 without raising more money?

Or is this more like a bonfire that requires more fuel to keep burning?

From the Ars Technica article... OpenAI’s headline “net loss” number of just over $5 billion in 2024 ballooned to nearly $39 billion in 2025. But the 2025 number includes a significant accounting charge related to investor valuations that shifted amid the company’s 2025 conversion to a for-profit structure. The Financial Times cites “a person familiar with the matter” in reporting that this non-recurring charge was approximately $30 billion and that OpenAI’s 2025 net loss amounted to a more reasonable-looking $8 billion without it.

Huh? Where did $30 billion go?

Written off.

They might not have spent $30b but they likely valued their asset base at >>> $30b+ and had to adjust that at the time of converting to for profit, is how I read it.

“One time non-recurring” is also just accounting double speak that lets executives cover up dumb stuff while sounding plausibly OK.

Profit and loss tracks changes to the fair price of purchasing the business, not operational cash flow. The $30b didn't go anywhere since it's not cash flow, it's acknowledging that someone who purchases OpenAI today would be on the hook for $30b more of future ownership dilution than before 2025.

They promised the former investors $30b in equity, which is like taking a loan accounting wise.

6 billion to sales and marketing…?

Not really, you can just get a smaller unrestricted model to prompt the bigger one