Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mcsniff's commentslogin

I'll bite. What type of watch do you have that has a direct USB-C port on it?

This one - https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2025/08/i-bought-a-16-smartwatch-ju...

No need for a magnetic dongle. I literally shove a USB-C cable in there, charge for a couple of hours, then get a week+ of use. Does step count, notifactions, calls, etc.

There's more to the world than Apple and Android watches.


They may be talking about something like the OnePlus watch, which does not have a usb-C port on it, but the charger device for the watch takes usb-C.

I have one and it's such a fantastic design. When I need to travel I just throw a tiny puck in my bag and it charges off the same brick that charges everything else I bring.

If a shop won't accept cash, I just leave.


You weren't transacting at all in Toronto during COVID then.

This is the endgame of surveillance capitalism: submission, or opting out. Few can, or care enough to, do the latter.


I'm as concerned about the surveillance state as anyone but let's keep our history constrained by fact. I live in Toronto too and it was still true that for many, many places cash was fine. Cash discounts are super common in various parts of the city and this was still true during COVID.


> let's keep our history constrained by fact. I live in Toronto too

This is hilarious. Toronto has no respect for facts, it has shown it will just fabricate histories out of whole cloth.

Nevertheless I'm tired of people citing anecdata and personal experience when upthread I have linked to a CBC article discussing a Bank of Canada report "arguing that cash-based transactions have plummeted from 54 per cent in 2009 to 10 per cent as of 2021."

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/canada-sleepwalking-in...


> You weren't transacting at all in Toronto during COVID then.

There's always someone will to take cash. It's still king, despite the naysayers.


What you're describing is not "broken", it's the process and it appears it hasn't even failed for you.

My experience with getting a verified "business" developer account from Google mirrors the experience as getting one from Apple, except it's a one-time fee and much less than Apple.

Yes there are hoops to jump through, identification usually requires some hoops, but pretty it's straightforward. I am not commenting on the requirements of these hoops, yes, it's BS that they exist but it's their platform so it's their rules.

What type of "experience" are you expecting to have anyway?


With Apple I filled the forms, accepted the agreements, entered the DUNS and paid with a card on my name and that was it.

How does that mirror uploading my passport many times, entering company details many times, typing my e-mail and phone numbers many times both because I had to start over and because I was asked many times even if I provided these some steps back? Now I paid and waiting, hopefully I will later be verifying my e-mail address or something that I verified a few times prior.

> What type of "experience" are you expecting to have anyway?

The Apple experience. An experience that is well thought and streamlined, that doesn’t keep me entering the same information over and over again. I don’t mind paying a little more for well designed products. The $75 difference is nothing to justify this charade, I don’t think that that Google was short of $75 and designed this low quality experience, I think it’s engraver in their DNA.


Other people seem to have different experiences: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582372


> What type of "experience" are you expecting to have anyway?

Being told upfront what is required to complete the process so you don't have to start over again multiple times?


It's not broken, it's the process ???

What would you consider broken?


If you want to absolve yourself of personal responsibility, go ahead and blame "them" and "we".

You were free to drink lead-free water the entire time, you just didn't care enough to do so.


We also stopped breathing fall out when they stopped doing atmospheric nuclear tests.

If only those lazy 1950s layabouts carries oxygen tanks instead of complaining about cancers.


100+ times a day? Explain yourself.

I login/unlock my password manager maybe...a dozen times a week and that would be a high count when I'm doing "business" and logging in for financial things.


Not the OP, but I have a dotfile that aliases the 1Password CLI. I use that heavily every day.


OctoPi Launcher is a solid replacement for Nova, it has swipe up/down functionality.


Thank you! I think not open source unfortunately?


And what exactly stops this from happening to any company or organization, regardless of being US-based?

If 90% of customers are in the US, they're probably going to comply.


Your demo video could be better. As a whole, this looks extremely rushed.

Zooming in and out makes it hard to focus and see what is actually happening.

The cursor moves around very erratically. Difficult to follow.

You really couldn't spend a few minutes to re-record it without the "in action" typo in SAMPLE_VALUE?

Why are you moving between Logs, Compute, Storage, etc. so quickly with no time for the viewer to see what's in there and nothing to highlight?


No, not "only". E2EE is now used as a dog whistle.

Who holds/controls the keys on both ends?


End-to-end usually means only the data's owner (aka the customer) holds the keys needed. The term most used across password managers and similar tools is "zero knowledge encryption", where only you know the password to a vault, needed to decrypt it.

There's a "data encryption key", encrypted with a hash derived of your username+master password, and that data encryption key is used locally to decrypt the items of your vault. Even if everything is stored remotely, unless the provider got your raw master password (usually, a hash of that is used as the "password" for authentication), your information is totally safe.

A whole other topic is communications, but we're talking decryption keys here


Just some constructive feedback. Your site needs a little bit of work on design and copy.

"test your personal user account one month free for." and other (translation?) mistakes.

Your use of capitalisation and spelling is not consistent throughout each page.

FAQ page is empty?

Quick Manual page is empty?

iOS download link doesn't work.

Your security posture boils down to "we're German, trust us"?


That was also my first impression when I saw the site. The color scheme in general looked more like "boring b2b SaaS" and not a personal budgeting app and not really something where I'd look forward to spending a lot of time in (Which ideally you should in a budgeting app).

I think it could benefit from a personal, playful kind of touch to appeal to more mainstream users.


Indeed. The capitalization and punctuation inconsistencies are a huge turn off. My instinct was that people behind the software don’t have attention to detail.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: