Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sumedh's commentslogin

In my experience these models (glm 5.1) struggle after 100K tokens.

GLM-5.1 had a coherency bug at launch, it might be worth retrying it if you haven't in a while. It can now use the full 256k context as intended.

Interesting, will give it a try again, thanks.

> short sided leadership in the US that basically traded our knowledge, design and manufacturing knowledge for cheap of shoring

The shareholders and execs got rich, you are not rewarded for very long term performance so why bother thinking what will happen 10 - 20 years later.


Who defines what is public good?

Well, the public. It’s in the name.

> but the soul & humanity of their skill is gone.

If robots make life saving surgery cheaper so that many people can afford it, isnt that a good thing?


> I believe it's on you to understand it.

This is exactly why Google has 10 messenger Apps.


Google released their latest messenger app 9 years ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chat

I wonder if he is using Anthropic's claude code to work on his Anthropic Github account.

Didnt Google start the race with their paper?

Google (and other labs) wanted to keep the tech internal because of the obvious safety concerns. Once they were confident that the tech was understood and under control, the public could start being drip fed. Everyone on the ground back then was hyper cautious.

Then Altman made ChatGPT public, and the race began.


No that is not true, Google didn't release it because they feared it would kill their search business, nothing to do with safety.

> "4.6 was such a bad model,"

It's just amusing reading all these posts with different viewpoints, just in this thread there are multiple people saying 4.6 was so much better than 4.7 and that they switched back to 4.6.


I also find it amusing. I also heard a lot of "4.7 is garbage, everybody hates it". Shows you how important proper validation techniques are, not just gut feeling.


that is a fair point, everything i said above was in my experience.

* in our experience, in our evals and codebase, 4.6 was a bad model. This is over 60k developers, so statistically significant.


Yes but Anthropic made a deal with SpaceX and increase usage limits by 50%, so you might not hit your limits.


Can confirm what others have posted, i tried some random snacks/sweets in some of the 711 stores in Japan and they were really good, for some reason I was not expecting it to be so good.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: