Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | testing22321's commentslogin

Social media was unleashed onto the world with no harm studies or thought for the long term impact.

Now we’re catching up and realizing how bad it is.

For a similar case, see tasers in Canada after a handcuffed immigrant was killed by one. The question came up “how were tasers certified safe for humans?”. The answer was “they weren’t. A private company just started selling them to police forces who just started using them.”


> Social media was unleashed onto the world with no harm studies or thought for the long term impact.

To require a safety study for anything someone might "unleash" as a public product would be bonkers: nobody would be able to release anything at all.

But I do not think social media as such — when originally it came to prominence — was anything that caused significant harm. Things like internet forums, BBs and blogs did have some troublesome elements rooted in privacy of the participants (allowing harrasement, for instance). In all though, it was a positive for society though — I have learned so much as a kid by exploring areas where experts out their expertise out and discussed challenges with you.

While the trend of this continued with the birth of modern social media like MySpace, Facebook, Orkut/Google Wave/Google Plus, Twitter, Instagram, Digg, Reddit, Flickr... originally they were a significant net positive for society too — they opened up the world for many to express themselves (just like blogs did for the more technically savy).

At some point, trying to monetize attention, the winning social media companies started applying well established (from traditional media), arguably immoral marketing tactics: leveraging psychological research to keep people engaged and sell ads for their financial gain.

I believe targeting these practices regardless of the media type is what needs to be regulated.

Harassment is already well regulated, but with kids (and adults), they do not always take it seriously or are not able to detect it: I am acknowledging this needs work too.


> To require a safety study for anything someone might "unleash" as a public product would be bonkers

Let’s examine that and see if it holds up.

To sell food, it is regulated and must be approved. And drugs. And cars. And anything that plugs into power. Anything that makes noise. Anything with an engine. Any kids toy. Any structural or safety item.

In fact, I would say the very vast majority of “public products” that a person wants to sell must be certified and meet regulations for that category of one kind or another.

Now you may say software is different. Often yes, but some software (gambling, health stuff, credit card stuff) must be certified and meet regulations. There are hefty penalties for breaking the rules.

And finally you might say this is different because social media is free. Plenty of things in the world that are free must meet regulations and pass tests (free drinking water, free power, etc). Just because I offer a free shuttle to my venue doesn’t mean the bus or driver are not regulated. Even if you give away free food you must have a food safe certification so you don’t make people sick with half-cooked chicken.

So you see, “unleashing” public products into the world with no approval or testing or regulations or evidence that it doesn’t cause harm is actually the exception, not the rule.


Well, all of those have specific rules written about them to except them from the default "no restrictions".

You can build a shovel and sell it. You can build a ceramic dish and sell it. You can print a book and sell it...


Right, there are plenty of things that have no restrictions.

Over the years once a thing was deemed a significant impact or safety concerns, restrictions were added to it.

Doing so for social media is very far from unprecedented.


Tasers are bad is your example? cops should go back to clubbing people over the head I suppose? - Remember all metaphors are bad.

Is 90% equal to 24x7, 365?

Yes. The refueling takes the most time but that is planned years in advance. A one-year planned outage every decade can still be 24/7/365 in the other nine years.

Natrium is expected to spend around 1 month refueling every 24 months.

So that is say 5% downtime. Add in time for upgrades and refurbishments, and refueling periods alone are bang on the 10% downtime number.

Ah yes, the ol' GitHub method of reporting. "When we're up, we have lots of nines!"

Which is why people who run websites shouldnt be allowed anywhere near powerplants.

Also absolutely minimum of 20 years to build it.

So this is fixing nothing short term.


> Watterson has a recurring dream about his old college where he doesn’t know what class he’s taking or where he’s meant to be. He roams the grounds, growing more flustered with each confused step. Right before he wakes, he thinks, “How many more years until I graduate…? Wait, didn’t I graduate already? How old am I?”

I’m 44 and I have this dream every few months about high school and university. Something deep inside.


I grew up in a town in Australia nicknamed “the city of roundabouts.”

Four way stops simply don’t exist.

When well designed, roundabouts are excellent for traffic flow and reducing accidents and severity of accidents.

If I was king for a day I’d replace all four way stops with them.


I don't think Australia has many true four way stops in cities and towns. Usually there's a give way sign on two of the directions, or lights, or a roundabout.

Unmarked intersections do exist, mostly on bush tracks and backroads, but I don't think I've ever seen the four stop sign arrangement here in Vic. Apparently it's slightly more common in NSW.


As far as I’m aware they are nonexistent. I’ve driven a lot of the country and never seen one.

Grew up in windy Warrnambool. Guessing you are from my home town or Albury, WA.

obligatory callout to Carmel, Indiana who have made great strides in implementing roundabouts as much as possible

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carmel,_Indiana

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cc12tk--qU


His award is also tied to numbers of vehicles and robots sold.

So just increasing market cap won’t do it alone.

Even if he merged them, they still have to produce WAY more than they are now.


I remember buying the Radeon PCI with 32MB RAM for $650AUD…

I remember buying 128mb that was added on top of 64mb what brought me to the unbalanced 192 mb setup.

Diablo 2 stopped lagging when a necromancer joined the game and summoned all the skeletons...

On an unrelated note Path of exile 1 still lags even on a 5090


> On an unrelated note Path of exile 1 still lags even on a 5090

Bunch of games lag on a RTX Pro 6000, at one point (most points?) it's less about the hardware :)


Yes. Hopefully outside, in the park playing with a ball or running around.

The farmer doesn’t own that mega farm until he pays off the loans.

How does he get the money to do that?


By paying farm worker less than they deserve, farm equipment manufacturers more than they deserve, and using farming practices that destroy the ecology and depend on continued fossil fuel extraction.

(And in California where the most profitable crops are perennial fruits and nuts, probably outright stealing water from the aquifer or state irrigation system.)


I’m still shocked we have not seen an extremely convincing AI video of a famous person or world leader announcing something huge like UBI or WW3 or aliens.

Surely it’s just a matter of time.


They're out there, recommending scam investments / crypto coins more often than major world events.

Meta, for one, is keen to bury such things and avoid responsibility for ad contents: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-17/andrew-forrest-battle...


Oh, I assumed they were already out there in the sea of slop like the Iran Lego propaganda tiktoks.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: