Today on open source vampires: xaomi forks an open source project, doesn't contribute upstream, attaches usage restrictions that are probably incompatible with the license, and wants good PR. Fuck these people.
I think there's a pretty big difference here. It's not like Github prevents you from building a Github competitor. Or Linear is preventing you from using it to build a Linear competitor.
This is more akin to Windows somehow preventing you from building a new OS.
I remember working for a company that did a lot of business in logistics. We were strictly prohibited from using any Amazon Web Services because several of our very high profile customers didn’t want anything on AWS. The higher ups were thoroughly convinced Amazon would copy it (and I mean, they came out with a product that competed with us, so they weren’t wrong!)
This kind of stuff “but they’ll copy us” is always weird (and wrong). Logistics isn’t some secret sauce. It’s taught in operations degrees across colleges. If a company is worried that all it takes is another company “copying” their IP to supersede them, then you don’t have a company, you have a simple app.
Amazon didn’t “copy” logistics from Apple. But both of them use similar underlying processes and optimizations. They both excel at it, and neither is eating the other’s profits. The same goes for smaller companies. Or the logistics providers like UPS.
> This is more akin to Windows somehow preventing you from building a new OS.
Tangent, but have you tried repartitioning your Windows disk to make room for a new OS? Or tried to configure Windows to let you dualboot? Or get the clock time right if you dualboot? Or let you debug "Secure Boot"?
Windows is outright hostile when it comes to (sharing with) a new OS
The popularity of SaaS was never derived from the products themselves, but rather business' weird aversion to doing in-house development. Most companies not in tech view software as literal magic, and act as if hiring some engineers could risk opening Pandora's box or something. Banks are particularly notorious for this; despite basically their entire business being done digitally, they treat software as a necessary evil, not as their underlying value.
But, the cost of in-house development just went down significantly. SaaS has always had a lot of broken promises. The thing is the software is never tailored to your use case, and you often have to integrate into your other tools anyway. And, you don't get to control the requirements, features, velocity, or bug fixes. Jira as a bug? Too bad I guess, hopefully it gets fixed eventually.
But the dirty secret is that companies are filled to the brim with bright-eyed aspirational employees, who want nothing more than to make their job easier and their company more efficient. The thing is they're doing it using cursed Excel workbooks on share drives. I think, in the near future, they'll be doing it with hand-rolled applications.
In comparison to some absurdist baseline maybe, actual software NEVER stops working under you, so in comparison something like an works 80% "most of the time" is godawful. Though I would argue that with SaaS the trend is toward 100% likelyhood to fuck your shit up given enough time, and it has borne out this way in the real world time and time again. SaaS is popular because it allows companies to more effectively extort you for your dollars.
Dang, given all the cool visual work on your website I absolutely would not have expected that. Always good to be reminded how disparate we all are from one another.
Makes me grateful I got my mom to sign that waiver to let me get on Neopets, I don't even see the hex code anymore, I just see marigold, umber, vermilion.
The best option is to run a Windows host with WSL and an extra EXT4 volume mounted to both windows and linux (this is a non issue as long as it's not the boot drive for linux). User WSL for everything linux, optionally you can also just mount the EXT4 volume with all your stuff to a real VM if you need to (this lets you have windows GUI apps in windows, tho maybe WSL does this now too?). Everything works, you have the best of all worlds.
I would recommend dual booting over doing this.
Microsoft is user hostile and the only thing they care about Windows users is how much ad revenue they can get from shoving AI down their users throats.
I recommend doing a dual boot. I personally do a multi drive dual boot, because again, Microsoft is user hostile and will sometimes randomly just blow away the Linux EFI partition if they're both on the same drive.
. If you have them on seperate drives and boot to the Linux drive by default you can then select Windows from the GRUB OS chooser menu. This way when Windows updates and makes changes the EFI partition its only doing it to its own drive.
This will give you the best of both worlds, the privacy and user freedom of Linux, and the ability to game on the Microslop.
Dual booting is hell, it's never good, it's never been good. I don't use my computer in a modal way. Willing to accept booting over as a friction point is crazy. You can just disable windows update and all the nags and then it's just a good operating system, mine often runs for many months without reboot. I have never seen a single ad in my OS.
It's absolutely not the best of both worlds if I can't simultaneously game (or run CAD software in my case) while running torch w/ triton at the same time.
To each their own. I've been dual booting Linux for a decade, at first to learn Linux, and for the past half decade as the secondary OS for the 1/10 games that don't work under Linux. I'm a Linux engineer so all my workflows are Linux focused and I prefer the customizability, flexibility and hackability of Linux to Windows anyways.
I don't trust the Windows OS with any of my personal files. Even if you disable updates Windows is continuously pinging Microsoft, Bing and adtech servers. It continuously prompts you to install OneDrive and upload your files to their cloud and adds TikTok/Facebook/to start menu on a fresh install and you have to use a hacky workaround to actually do an offline install without logging into a Microsoft account.
I'm looking forward to the day that Steam Linux has full game compatability and I can finally purge Windows from my system.
Ahhh, I see the issue, you must be using a Windows other than Windows 10 LTSB and presumably you don't trust your router. I dual booted for a long time before VMs were good, but the user experience of booting over is just so awful.
If you mount the Linux OS volume under windows while it's running it can get all fucked up because the two operating systems are not chill about who's really in control. You can avoid this by keeping the linux OS on it's own volume, but putting all the user data on a separate volume, you CAN mount this under both operating systems and get good speeds under both OSs, wheras using WSL native ability to access the host NTFS system is very very slow.
have you tried using proton//steam on linux lately? I find almost every game I want to play actually works decently well now. The ones that don't are multiplayer/online ones that require some sort of anti-cheat.
There are a few games I've found that don't work under Proton. Rome 2 Total War crashes frequently, Battletech ( the tactics game from a decade or so ago) doesn't always launch and has sound issues, and MechWarrior 5 joystick support doesn't work (the game is fine if you do another input method, but I'm not gonna play a sim game and not use my nice joystick). The instances of games which don't work in Proton are thankfully few and far between, but unfortunately it isn't just games with anticheat rootkits.
Nice, FWIW this is currently pretty easy to solve by just keeping your stuff on a separate EXT4 volume and then mounting that under Windows. Windows accessing a mounted EXT4 volume through WSL is much faster than the other way around.
reply