What's the reason for keeping the footage out of the public's hands?
Couldn't it be as simple as wanting to preserve some value for the fans who actually buy tickets?
In any case, if this footage is so valuable, why can't somebody with a good camera phone buy a seat in the nosebleed section, set up a tripod, and charge for the stream?
I'm fairly certain the NFL has licensing rights and prohibits any video reproduction of any kind so you could try to get away with it for awhile, but it wouldn't last long!
I believe a recording of a performance would be considered a derivative work under copyright law. As such what you're advocating is large-scale commercial copyright infringement against the NFL and the networks who pay it for exclusive rights.
In summary:
unambiguously unlawful + powerful enemies = won't end well
To be a performance there has to be a creative element, not just a skill. Like wrestling for example, which is pre-scripted.
Otherwise someone jumping on a trampoline in his backyard could claim that he is performing and forbid the neighbor from recording him on a copyright basis (rather than a privacy basis - they are completely different laws).
I believe the stadiums as private properties can set rules on what is allowed to be brought in. Most ticket have a disclaimer on the back saying you can't film in the stadium but IANAL. It could just be FUD.
Couldn't it be as simple as wanting to preserve some value for the fans who actually buy tickets?
In any case, if this footage is so valuable, why can't somebody with a good camera phone buy a seat in the nosebleed section, set up a tripod, and charge for the stream?